TНE EFFECТ OF USING DEDUCТIVE AND INDUCТIVE MEТНODS ON ТНE VERBAL INТERACТION OF PНYSICAL EDUCAТION AND SPORТ PROFESSORS

Volume 12, Issue 2 (2022)

MOURAD ZAIR, REDНOUANE BENSASSI

Apstrakt:

This study investigates the eﬀect of using the deductive and inductive teaching methods on verbal interaction of physical education and sport professors. The study uses the descriptive approach by tackling two samples of two diﬀerent professors from the same secondary school (Houari Boumediene, state of El-Bayadh). Then it applies “Hamdan Tool” to observe and analyze the overall verbal interaction over 8 lectures. This research shows that there is less verbal interaction with the professor when he uses the inductive method comparing to the use of the deductive one. To sum up, the study rec- ommends that the use of diﬀerent methods where the professor’s verbal interaction is less than the student’s one. Moreover, a further research about this study is extremely needed.

Ključne riječi:

Deductive and inductive teaching methods, verbal interaction, physical education and sport professor

Puni tekst:

PDF

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/

Reference:

Abu Abdo, H. A. (2002). Fundamentals of Teaching Motor and Physical Education. Alexandria: Radiation Library.

Aqbi, A. A. (2017). Evaluation of the teaching of physical and sports education teachers in secondary education of the Republic of Yemen as seen by mentors- teachers- pupils. Scientiﬁc Journal of Physical and Sports Activity Sciences and Techniques, 378-415.

Dreij, M. (2000). Introduction to the teaching process (analysis of the teaching process). Rabat: National Centre for The Formation of Educa- tion Inspectors.

Hamdan, M. Z. (1999). Preparing learning and teaching modern education series. Oman, Jordan: Modern Education House.

Hamdan, M. Z. (2010). Teaching observation tools Concepts and methods of measurement in classroom education. Damascus: Dar Al Kitab. Hull, J. V., & Virnelli, S. (1987). Hardiness and health: A critique and alternative approach. Journal of personality et social psychology, 53(3),

518-530.

Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The journal of the learning sciences, 4(1), 39-103.

Kadri, A. A. (2019). Teaching Behaviors of Teachers of Physical and Physical Education for the Intermediate and Secondary Stages According to Hamdan’s Tool for Observing and Analyzing Comprehensive Classroom Interaction. Sports creativity, 73-96.

Kalza, R. A. (1987). Social material between endoscopy and application. Makkah: University Student Library.

Marwan, J. (2016). Degree of knowledge of the professor of physical and physical education of the constructivist model in learning. Journal of Science and Technology for Physical and Sports Activities, 60.

Mohammed.F. (2005). A comparative study of the achievement of cognitive goals and trends towards the subject of teaching methods in physi- cal education. Al-Rafidain journal, 12.

Mohsen Attia Ali. (2006). Suﬃcient in Arabic language teaching methods (Vol. 1). Oman, Jordan: Dar Al Shorouk. Nour, E. (2004). The psychology of adolescence. Alexandria: University Youth Foundation.

Salem AbuZeid Attia. (2013). Brief teaching methods. Oman: Jarir Publishing and Distribution House. Sayma, A. A. (1995). Anxiety and Academic Achievement. Arab Center for Student Services.

Taleb, A. (2018). The reality of applying the curricula of the second generation of the approach with competencies in the teaching of physical and sports education in middle education. Journal of Science and Technology for Physical and Sports Activities, 22-38.